#13 Nov. 30th, 2018
Write a summary for each one of the 6 categories of the Individual Multimedia Presentation and Oral Defense Rubric
#5 Sept. 4th, 2018
Write a brief summary of each category expectations for IRR (Task #1) rubric. Please write an 8-rows reflection on the IRR (essays) you read (which one was a high, a medium or a low; what do you think about the topics; are they well written?; are the sources reliable and relevant enough?; what about conventions?).
1.- In the first row, "understand and analyze context", the research must identify as well as explain the relevance of the research question within a larger scale. It must show a clear connection to a stimulus package and must not place it in a limited context.
ReplyDelete2.- In the second row, "Establish Argument", it's organization, reasoning and how complex the research is are analyzed. Evidence must be connected to claims in order to convey the audience and support/ establish an argument.
3.- In the third row, "Select and Use Evidence", the relevance and importance of evidence used is grade. Whether is successfully archives to incorporate various perspectives and develop the argument and how it is synthesised.
4.- In the fourth row, " Establish Argument", the prevention must offer possible solutions and explain each throughly, in detail. It's limitation and implications must be included and addressed as well to convince the audience.
5.- in the fifth row, "Engage Audience", the presentation must emphasis relevant information and its design for the audience. It align and effectively contextualise data from the research.
6.- In the sixth row, "Engage Audience", they presenter will be grade, his or her performance techniques are observed. Vocal variety body movement, facial expressions and how much the person strongly communicates his or her argument.
1.- In the first row for the Oral defense rubric, "Reflect", the relevance of the answer given is graded. What specific data is given to support the answer or how he or she articulates a detailed response.
2.- In the second row for the Oral defense rubric,"Establish Argument", the significance of the inquiry is explained by using relevant information. Why is such question important?
1. The presentation successfully shows the audience the importance of the topic explained and the correlation between this and the stimulus package.
ReplyDelete2. The presentation is complex but clear and well-reasoned; the evidence established convinces the audience.
3. The presentation correctly summarizes the evidence without leaving out important information using numerous perspectives.
4. The presentations includes implications, limitations, possible solutions, and final conclusions.
5. The design of the presentation engages the audience and helps the comprehension of the overall delivery.
6. The presenter makes eye contact and has a proper level of voice as well as good diction and fluency.
1. The response is detailed, supported by specific evidence with fluency.
2. The response shows that the presenter understands the importance of the inquiry and explains it verbally.
1.- The presentation clearly shows that the topic being discussed is relevant and truly creates a question in the audience's minds.
ReplyDelete2.- The presentation is well organized, the transition between one topic to another is logically and strategically placed.
3.- The presentation shows a large variety of sources which are all reliable for the audience to trust on.
4.- The presentation shows truly logical resolutions and conclusions which seem well stated and thought of.
5.- The presentation's design attracts the audience and displays a creative theme.
6.- The presentation clearly used delivering techniques which attracts the audience attention and entertains them.
1.- The response is supported by evidence and detailed.
Delete2.- The response proves that the presenter knows the importance and significance of the topic.
1. Has to show a relevance to the stimulus material provided. The research question must be placed in a larger context and must be connected to the stimulus packet.
ReplyDelete2. Has to be organized in a logical way where the claims are supported by evidence and the argument must be established.
3. Has to have synthesised information and evidence from multiple perspectives to help develop and support the argument.
4. Has detailed solutions or conclusions, also states any possible limitations or implications.
5. Has a design that keeps the audience engaged by contextualising the information; the important details are emphasized and and is designed accurately for the audience.
6. Has a careful selection of performance techniques such as eye contact or hand gestures, these must be according to what the presentation is stating and need to help support the argument presented.
1. The response is detailed and well articulated, must be supported by relevant and specific evidence previously mentioned.
2. Response explains the significance of the question by providing specific details that go along the context of the question posed.
1. This row is about how well does the presentation or presenter explains the research question and how it connects it to the stimulus package
ReplyDelete2. How well is the presentation organized and does it has reasoning. It emphasizes the connection between claims and evidence to establish a convincing argument.
3. It explains various perspectives with relevant and reliable evidence which will develop and support the argument.
4. It synthesizes a concise conclusion or solution that considers limitations and implications.
5. The presentation engages the audience in information selected: it aligns with the information and it emphasizes the information.
6. The delivery of performance techniques support in an effective way the communication of the whole presentation specially the argument.
Alex A
ReplyDelete1- Through the presentation, the research question is broadly answered, considering each aspect that makes up the question, and shows a valid connection with one of the stimulus materials.
2- The presentation's syntax has to be followed through a logical order, meaning the claims need to be supported by evidence, that enforce the argument.
3- Multiple perspectives are analyzed, in order for the reliable evidence of the presentation to support the argument.
4- The presentation has to lead to a valid and constructive solution, were limitations and implications are considered. Within the conclusion, a defined resolution is encouraged.
5- The presentation offers an understandable design, that covers constructively all the information required for the audience.
6- The presenter uses techniques (eye contact, vocal variety, movement, etc.) that support what is
trying to be delivered.
1- The response is is supported by reliable evidence, that explains with detail what is trying to be answered.
2- The presenter notices the inquiry and explains the importance of the question within a larger context.
Javier-
ReplyDelete1. The importance and relevance of the research question is shown as well as how it connects to the stimulus materials
2. The presentation has good organization and it correctly connects all evidence and claims to establish an argument
3. There are various sources of evidence that provide different perspectives of the topic being discussed
4. Well structured solutions or conclusions are provided and the limitations and implications of each are provided
5. The design of the presentation goes well with what is being said and it does a good job in contextualizing the information, it is designed for the audience
6. There are various performance techniques being used during the presentation that strongly support the argument
1. The oral defense received an excellent response that is backed up by relevant evidence
2. The oral defense response explains the importance of the question asked